Melton A. McLaurin's book Celia, A Slave Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Melton A. McLaurins book Celia, A break ones back - Essay ExampleQuit the old man (McLaurin 30) her boyfriend encourages Celia, nevertheless she is in a predicament because she knows either way she will still lose him and endanger her life. 3. What did Celia have in common with Robert Newsoms daughters Virginia Waynescot and Mary Newsom? During the period of slavery, all women were the weaker sex and were made to sub collect to mens ways. In this regard, Robert Newsoms daughters, Virginia Waynescot and Mary Newsom were not equal to their amaze in terms of advocating for issues. Similar to Celia they also depended on their father on food, shelter and they little rights he would accord to them. Due to this experience Celia and the masters daughters depend to share a bond of oppression. A relationship based on moral comfort and interchangeable understanding in isolation. Celia pleaded with them to talk with their father on her behalf and they seem to agree but, it is not known whe ther they did so, but the versed demand continued. 4. Why did Celia go on trial? It would not have been surprising if Celia had been stated guilty by a judge and executed without a trial. Celia had to be taken to trial sightly as a formality so that she could get a hearing just like everyone else. This had been due to the political struggle that was apparent in the neighboring state of Kansas (McLaurin 46). There was a voting cognitive operation that was taking place on whether to include the state into the union as a free earth or a pro slave state. This process also included the slavery supporters and freedom supporters in a bid to try and sway the votes on their side and as such, divided the country. This sort of department threatened in Missouri if care was not taken in punishing slave hurt doers and as such Celia was taken to trial. 5. How could Celia be morally innocent of murder? In trying to advance Celia a fair trial, the judge presiding over her case appointed three supremely competent attorneys to her falsification which were chosen on the basis that they were neutral on the issues on slavery. The attorneys in their defense tried to show that Celia was not guilty of the murder. To their defense, they brought up the issue of sexual abuse between Cecile and her then master. This was to indicate that she move the act of murder in order wade off the masters sexual advancements that left her in a lot of pain both physically and mentally. This is also true due to the concomitant that as a slave, she had been raped for years, and this justified her intent to hurt the master to protect herself (McLaurin 43). Unfortunately in trying to hurt him, she killed him it was all in self defense. 2. Could a slave master trespass on his own spot? How an innocent verdict would have struck a devastating blow to the liberty of Slave-owners and set a controversial legal precedent Celias trial of guilt or honor in the case against the state for the murder of her master was of keen interest to the majority of the society. The slave owners were particularly concerned with this due to the fact that it would spell out their rights. Most of people were aware of the existence of sexual offenses towards slaves, but no one talked about it probably because they viewed it as the right of the owner on his/her property (McLaurin 67). This meant that they owned the